Conner's work is correct. To combine and make it simple, you Multiply:
(3^5+9)+(6^8+10) which will equal 3^14 6^18.
But Jane's work, instead of adding, Jane multiplies. So, Conner is correct.
Hope that helped!
12 ÷ 3= 4. Hope this helps. ;)
Answer:
<h2>We have 47% of chances to win those six bucks.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
In this problem we need to find the probabilty of winning thos $6.
According to the problem, we win $6 if we hit one red. We know that there are 18 red compartments, 18 black compartments and 2 neither red nor blakc, for a total of 38 compartments.
We need to use the standard probabilty definition which is the ratio between the number of events and the total number of outcomes. So,
Which is equivalent to 47% of chances.
Therefore, we have 47% of chances to win those six bucks. (The Casino has the odds in their favor)
Answer:
A. 3
Step-by-step explanation:
y - 9 = 3(x-2)
y = 3x - 6 + 9
y = 3x + 3
slope is 3x = 3
Well this is simple a calculator type problem...but if you are curious as the the algorithm used by simple calculators and such...
They use a Newtonian approximation until it surpasses the precision level of the calculator or computer program..
A newtonian approximation is an interative process that gets closer and closer to the actual answer to any mathematical problem...it is of the form:
x-(f(x)/(df/dx))
In a square root problem you wish to know:
x=√n where x is the root and n is the number
x^2=n
x^2-n=0
So f(x)=x^2-n and df/dx=2x so using the definition of the newton approximation you have:
x-((x^2-n)/(2x)) which simplifies further to:
(2x^2-x^2+n)/(2x)
(x^2+n)/(2x), where you can choose any starting value of x that you desire (though convergence to an exact (if possible) solution will be swifter the closer xi is to the actual value x)
In this case the number, n=95.54, so a decent starting value for x would be 10.
Using this initial x in (x^2+95.54)/(2x) will result in the following iterative sequence of x.
10, 9.777, 9.774457, 9.7744565, 9.7744565066299210578124802523397
The calculator result for my calc is: 9.7744565066299210578124802523381
So you see how accurate the newton method is in just a few iterations. :P
