1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
5

According to A. de Grey we cannot predict when humans would start to live over 200 hundred years of age. However, we can say wit

h scientific certainty that the person who will live over 300 hundred years of age is only a few years (10 or 20 years) younger than the first 200 years old. Can you explain why?
Biology
1 answer:
daser333 [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Because of the exponential advancements in technology.

Explanation:

The reason why the person who will live to be over 300 years of age is going to be only 10-20 years younger than the person who will live to be 200 years old is because of the exponential advancement rate in technology. It will come to a point where it will only take us 10-20 years of research and development to extend the human life from 200 to 300 years.

I hope this answer helps.

You might be interested in
How are consumers and producers similar?
stealth61 [152]
They both need nutrients to carry out life functions
4 0
2 years ago
Some scientists have proposed that the earliest forms of life may have existed in an "RNA World" where RNA was both the genetic
Kipish [7]

Answer:

The organism lives and replicates despite RNase and DNase treatment, but the organism dies when treated with protease

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Abiotic components of a community include all of them except
Gekata [30.6K]
<span>Abiotic = Nonliving 

Plants are living, they are biotic factors</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these statements is correct about light?
motikmotik

Answer: The answer is D. Unless light goes through a medium (like water or air) then light would be at its fastest speed going through a vacuum.

7 0
3 years ago
Why are both primary and secondary resources important when you’re researching?
shtirl [24]

Answer:

Most research uses both primary and secondary sources. They complement each other to help you build a convincing argument. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but secondary sources show how your work relates to existing research.

Explanation:

There you go, have an awesome daaay :)

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best describes a nucleotide? A. a nitrogen base and a five-carbon sugar only B. a five-carbon sugar, a ph
    10·1 answer
  • Can you help me please it’s science and I will give you a Brainly list
    9·2 answers
  • "Provided that cAMP levels are not influenced by factors other than G protein signaling, which hypothesis would be better suppor
    13·1 answer
  • Which areas receive more sunlight as compared to the polar areas? the areas receive more sunlight as compared to the polar areas
    13·1 answer
  • Through what process can special interest groups and businesses influence the government? A. protests B. lobbying C. tax payment
    9·2 answers
  • Movement of the chromosomes during anaphase would be most affected by a drug that prevents mitosis and cell division. What is th
    10·1 answer
  • What are 2 most important heat absorbing gases in the lower atsmopehere?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain how convergent evolution leads to analogous structures.
    8·1 answer
  • A scientist measures the circumference of acorns in a population of oak trees and discovers that the most common circumference i
    15·1 answer
  • In order to prevent accidental needle stick injury and potential exposure to infectious agents, what should you do with needles
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!