1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nookie1986 [14]
3 years ago
13

The _____ syndrome refers to the frequent transition of those who leave positions with the federal government to become lobbyist

s or consultants for the private-interest groups they helped to regulate
Social Studies
1 answer:
kozerog [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:  Revolving door syndrome

Explanation:

Revolving door syndrome is the  defined as the process in which a client tends to improve himself/herself for a particular time and then set back to the same condition again. In political field, changing of government job to involve in interest group job due to regulation and legislation impact.

According to the question, leaving a government job position to obtain the position of lobbyist for their interest or private group to gain benefit is the example of revolving door syndrome.

You might be interested in
What does the color green represent in ireland
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

What made green the color associated with Ireland in the first place? ... According to the Irish government, green on the national flag symbolizes the Gaelic political and social order of Ireland or the Catholic side while orange symbolizes the followers of William of Orange in Ireland or the protestant side.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In this unit, you learned about civilizations that once existed in Europe and the Middle East. You also learned about different
NemiM [27]

Answer:

There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"

If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.

Explanation:

hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
In which situation would you have to cancel your shooting schedule for the day?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

should be c

Explanation:

Umm pretty self explanatory

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why did the framers of the constitution insist on having federal judges be nominated instead of elected
Anastasy [175]

The framers of the Constitution insisted that federal judges be nominated instead of elected due to their desire to have judges above the shifting whims of the masses.

The hope, whether achieved or not, was that federal judges would only be beholden to the law and that by not having judges be elected, they would be protected if that law dictated an outcome that ran counter to popular opinion.



4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do the physical layers of Earth match up with the chemical layers of Earth?
forsale [732]
Yes it does match up with the layers
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement BEST describes due process? 1.A jury in a court of law finds a defendant "Not Guilty" on every charge made again
    7·1 answer
  • The American colonists write the declaration of independence, in part, because the British government:
    15·1 answer
  • Why do lobbyists, constituents and floor leaders influence the actions of a member of congress
    9·1 answer
  • What map shows names of states ,countries or continents
    7·1 answer
  • Why is it a good idea to space out study sessions instead of studying something all at once? Research suggest that spaced practi
    13·1 answer
  • When did the practice of buddhism decline in india
    7·1 answer
  • I need the definition for, Core Democratic Values, Individual Rights, Natural Rights/Unalienable Rights, Rule of Law.
    15·2 answers
  • Dr. Wiley asks students to look at real-world problems related to political science, instead of reading and studying textbooks a
    13·1 answer
  • How are beaches formed??
    6·2 answers
  • Robert asks thomas if he heard a knock at the door, and thomas says that he did not. robert, swearing he heard a knock, goes to
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!