What action could slow a chemical reaction rate?

1 answer:

6 0

The action that could slow a chemical reaction rate is adding more of a substance to a mixture. The answer is letter d. It does not give time for the rest of the reactants to be consumed because you are adding more of it causing to slow the reaction.

You might be interested in

A chemist takes 50-gram sample of sulfur powder that has a melting point of 115.2 °C. What is the melting point of a 100-gram sa

Viktor [21]

Answer:

115.2 °C since melting point is an intensive property

Step-by-step explanation:

The melting point of a substance does not depend on how much you have.

For example, the melting point of water is 0 °C, whether it is an ice cube from the refrigerator or in the frozen pond outside.

The freezing point of a substance is an <em>intensive property</em>.

Thus, the melting point of 100 g of sulfur is 115.2 °C because melting point in an intensive property.

7 0

3 years ago

The microscopes used today are just like the ones used by Leeuwenhoek and Hooke. True or false

Dmitry [639]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

While we do know that A. Leeuwenhoek used a simple microscope that consisted of only 1 lens, Hooke used a compound microscope. Although, after trying a compound microscope, Hooke found out that it strained his eyes and continued to use a simple microscope for his <em>Micrographia</em>.

Thus, we can say that the (compound) microscopes used today are different than the (simple) microscope used by Hooke and Leeuwenhoek.

6 0

2 years ago

Although both N2 and 02 are naturally present in the air we breathe, high levels of NO and NO2 in the atmosphere occur mainly in

joja [24]

Answer:

(a) Increasing the temperature adds heat which is a reactant shifting the equilibrium rightwards.

(b) Pressure has no effect since the change in the number of moles is zero.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, one could represent the given reaction as:

$N_2(g)+O_2(g)+ \Delta _rH \leftrightarrow 2NO$

Since it is endothermic. Thus, solving the (a) statement, one identifies the heat as a reagent, that is why the reaction cools down as it progress, therefore, by increasing the temperature, heat is added, that is, a reagent is added, which shifts the equilibrium rightwards, in other words, more NO is produced so its concentration increases.

Furthermore, for the (b) statement, since the change in the number of moles is zero, based on the stoichiometric coefficients as shown below:

$\Delta \nu =2-1-1=0$