Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
A. The US population increased slightly during that time
Explanation:
He clearly thinks and stresses over his family and is his most vital ownership. Being in prison gave him a decent favorable position; he had sustenance and a place to rest. He was terrified for his family and realized that they required him and in the end felt remorseful. He truly had all that he required in prison while the family didn't.
Answer:
The Indian Rebellion of 1857. The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a period of uprising in northern and central India against British rule in 1857–58. The rebellion was the result of decades of ethnic and cultural differences between Indian soldiers and their British officers.
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Let me know if it's wrong. :) Thanks!
