Find the slope of the line going through the points

In the book Essentials of Marketing Research, William R. Dillon, Thomas J. Madden, and Neil H. Firtle discuss a research proposa

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

$z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500$

$p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=25$ represent the number of homeowners who would buy the security system

$X_{2}=9$ represent the number of renters who would buy the security system

$n_{1}=140$ sample 1

$n_{2}=60$ sample 2

$p_{1}=\frac{25}{140}=0.179$ represent the proportion of homeowners who would buy the security system

$p_{2}=\frac{9}{60}= 0.15$ represent the proportion of renters who would buy the security system

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the two proportions differs , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{25+9}{140+60}=0.17$

Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500$

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.

6 0

3 years ago

Carol is solving the inequality 3 have? There are infinitely many solutions. There are only two solutions. There is

schepotkina [342]

Answer:

There are infinitely many solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

Firstly, I need to change f to x as the system won’t accept the word f

Let’s take a look at the question;

3 is less than x

The domain of our answer lies in the the range of values where we have numbers that are greater than 3

This means we can rewrite our inequality as x is greater than 3

Now, simply because we have an infinite amount of numbers which are greater than 3 of which x can take any of the values, we can conclude that the number of values we have for x are infinite and does not end

This makes us have infinitely many solutions for the value of x

6 0

3 years ago

Quadrilateral ABCD is inscribed in a circle. Find the measure of each of the angles of the quadrilateral.

Nadusha1986 [10]

Here is a reference to the Inscribed Quadrilateral Conjecture it says that opposite angles of an inscribed quadrilateral are supplemental.

Explanation:

The conjecture, #angleA and angleC# allows us to write the following equation:

#angleA + angleC=180^@#

Substitute the equivalent expressions in terms of x:

#x+2+ x-2 = 180^@#

#2x = 180^@#

#x = 90^@#

From this we can compute the measures of all of the angles.

#angleA=92^@#

#angleB=100^@#

#angleC=88^@#

#angleD= 80^@#

4 0

3 years ago

Fill in the blanks to show the sum of (2x2+4x) and (x+8).

Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

tune me in write quick big steppa checkin in yall stay safe keep dat head up and stay out da way all love

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Cody saves all his nickels. Today he is getting them out of his piggy bank and wrapping them to take to the bank. He finds he ha

erastovalidia [21]

To find the number of wrappers he needs, divide 360 by 40. This is your answer. 360/40 = 9

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers