The french were in canada
Answer:
a. natural law for Josh, and legal positivism for Colin.
Explanation:
Natural law is a concept that seeks to ground law in common sense, rationality, equity and pragmatism. It does not propose a description of human affairs through a formalized theory or law; Nor does it seek to reach the level of descriptive social science. Natural law has, as its project, to evaluate human options in order to act reasonably and well in the conception of the individual. Josh is using the concept of natural law when he believes, based on his own common sense conceptions, that it is correct for him to decide how fast he will have to ride his own car.
On the other hand, legal positivism refers to a set of norms formulated and enforced by human beings. These norms represent an order that must be followed even if it seems unfair and incorrect. This can be seen in Colin's argument that Josh must slow down the car because it is exceeding the speed allowed by law.
Answer:0.01%
Explanation: Driving Under the Influence i fers driving or operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drug to the extent of rendering the driver unsafe to drive a vehicle. Drinking alcohol that raises the blood alcohol concentration level above 0.01% reflects a flushed, visible red appearance on the face and impaired judgement and muscle coordination is considered illegal for persons under the age of 21. Hence, the repercaution could include mandatory jail term, substantial fees, revocation of driver's license and suspension
According to Bandura, learning can occur by watching others and then modeling what they do or say. This is known as observational learning. ... Through modeling, Bandura has shown that children learn many things both good and bad simply by watching their parents, siblings, and others.