Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
Snowball sampling
Explanation:
Snowball sampling is one where the researcher gets a sample by asking participants in the study if they know other potential participants. The current participants refer new ones.
Answer:
The buyer has no recourse because he/she did not specify which one he wanted included in the purchase agreement
Explanation:
In the purchase agreement, the seller made an offer buy the buyer failed to specify exactly what he/she wanted and the colour or arrangement, The buyer failed to clarify the terms for the purchase agreement hence he cannot sue the seller.
