The answer is c....the whole purpose was to keep them as segregated as possible
Sara is probably unpopular.
In general, people acted silly in front of their peers in order to gained attention from their social group.
Combined with the fact that Sara is insensitive to her friend's feeling, we could conclude that Sara is not received very well among her social groups despite her efforts to gained attention.
The Congress accepted Smithson's bequeathed and pledged to the United States for a charitable trust. After many years of debates, an Act of Congress that was signed by President Polk, stating that Smithson's money will be used to establish the Smithsonian Institution. Since its founding until the recent, Smithsonian Institution became one of the world's largest museum.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Choose the propaganda style that best fits the statement below. "My opponent, Governor Thomason has raised taxes, increased spending and lied to you, the American people."
plain folks
name calling
card stacking
bandwagon
Answer:
The propaganda style that best fits the statement is:
B. name calling.
Explanation:
We can easily reach the conclusion above via elimination. Let's take a look at each of the options:
A. plain folks: a style of propaganda that attempts to depict a certain person as "one of the people" or "average Joe". It's commonly used by politicians to show us they are ordinary people just like us. This option is INCORRECT.
<u>B. name calling: a style that consists of saying bad things about one's opponent in order to make people see him from a negative perspective. Often involves attributing pejorative nicknames or adjectives to the other. This is precisely what we have here, since the speaker is calling his opponent a liar. This option is CORRECT.</u>
C. card stacking: a style which manipulates information in order to make something or someone look better. This option is INCORRECT.
D. bandwagon: a technique that relies on the idea of "jumping on board" or "everyone else is doing this, and so should you." This is clearly not the case here. This option is INCORRECT.
The corporations and unions have been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010 because the Supreme Court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Supreme Court in its judgement of a 2010 case fought between the parties 'Citizen United' and the 'Federal Election Commission' clarified that the expenditure made by a political party to communicate with its subjects forms an integral part of their freedom of speech and hence their spending on election campaigns cannot be capped by law.
