The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
The insurgency elements that a<span>re active sympathizers who provide important support services but do not participate in combat operations is: </span><span>Auxiliary
Within a combat operation, there is always be a group of individuals that exist in battlefield without any intention to fight for both groups.
One example of this is the Red Cross.
In every combat, The Red Cross will provide medical assistance to any participants that are injured in the battlefield without seeing which side those participants are in. It is a very common norm in a battlefield that members of the red cross should not be attacked under any circumstances.</span>
Read actively, not passively. ...
Pick a good time to read. ...
Engage in Reading. ...
Social science articles are rarely linear. ...
Skim read. ...
Analyze what you've read.