Answer:
We limit ourselves
Explanation:
With books it´s the same as with people: the more diverse the books you read or the people you meet, the more your mind opens up to different views of how the world is or could/should be. Totalitarian regimes - as the one presented to us in Fahrenheit 451 - can be succesful exactly in situations where everybody follows blindly one personal view (that of the leader) or, as in religious fundamentalism, one book.
The correct answer to this
question is when:
<span>
“d. we have begun to think for ourselves about
moral questions”</span>
<span>Based on the Socratic view
of morality by Frankena, morality is ingrained in all of us. We must not let
our choices be determined by our emotions, rather inspect the moral question
and go after the best reasoning. The only question we need to answer is whether
the action is right or wrong, and not what will occur to use, what others will feel
of us, nor how we feel about what happened. </span>
Because reflexes permit faster responses without having to bypass several synapses the higher reasoning or conscious thought is not necessary or desirable features of reflexes. The importance of reflexes is to cause something to happen. speed of prime importance, not information. You don't care how hot the stove is that in your hand is on, you just want to get that hand off the stove as fast as possible. Our reflexes enable us to survive. Adding an intervening layer of thought is to get us into trouble.
Rocky mountains?i think this is correct but i am not a 100% sure. hope this helps
