1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Iteru [2.4K]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following does NOT describe the period of american imperialism

History
2 answers:
sattari [20]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

there is no list for me to answer which of the following lol i need to know what I have to answer

Explanation:

Pavel [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a period of nonaggressive American diplomacy and isolation

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Racial violence in the South in the late 1800s often included lynching, which is another term for
labwork [276]

Answer is A.

It was a brutal thing, oh but yes... It was used many times. Some were brutally beaten, whipped, burned and hanged.--- Alive.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me im stuck!!!!!!!!!!
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

put what the north has and then put what the south has into their boxes and then put the ones that they both have into the both boxes

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened in the 1680s that created conflict between Britain and the American colonies?
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

D. King James II gave his colonial governors more power.

Explanation:

History

6 0
2 years ago
Vladimir Lenin's takeover of the Russian government and implementation of a communist government in Russia
Bond [772]

Revolution continued because the civil war between the Red Army and the White Army was still in progress .

Russia was still a participant in World War I, with its Eastern Front fighting on the side of the Entente against the Central Powers. As she suffered heavy losses, she needed to leave the war. The Bolshevik political program entailed the rapid exit of Russia from the war, which they did after they came to power when they signed a separate peace treaty with Germany in March 1918. Thus, with great territorial and other concessions in favor of the Central Powers, Russia exited from World War I.

That was the time when the currents had already formed that would be on the opposite side of the Bolshevik. Thus began the civil war in Russia, as the most serious form of war, where he makes his war against his own.

Explanation:

  • Lenin and the Bolsheviks in power, had the vision of only one party in power, and oppressed and suppressed every other opposition. Of course, this led to dissatisfaction and hatred of the other party.
  • Little by little, armed conflicts began, the now-declared 'red' Bolsheviks and the opposite side where all Bolshevik opponents united in a 'white' coalition found themselves.
  • For the war needed armies, and so a Red Army was formed on the Bolshevik side with Leo Trotsky as the founder, and a "white" army on the opposite side who had found allies in the Entente. Fronts have been established and a war that will last a full three years has begun.
  • The Civil War was based on the almost four years of World War I that had already exhausted the country before.
  • He was very passionate and violent, followed by scarcity in everything. From war material, to medicine, clothing and most importantly food. The famine of the Russian population ensued, which would be most affected by the most numerous strata, that of peasants and workers. The war was fought under impossible conditions, both because of constant scarcity and because of famine and epidemics.

Class: History

Level: Middle school

Keywords: Russian Revolution, civil war, Lenin

Learn more on Russian revolution on

brainly.com/question/9625628

brainly.com/question/1161655

brainly.com/question/1151651

brainly.com/question/810738

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of herodotus'history?
Debora [2.8K]
Herodotus is famously known by the dual moniker, “Father of History, Father of Lies”. Whether or not he deserves the latter epithet is perhaps up for debate. He is sometimes criticized as unserious for his many cultural digressions and travelog sidebars. It would, however, take a truly obtuse and narrow-minded critic to deny him the former title. History as a thing separate from record-keeping and chronicling begins with Herodotus. In and among his entertaining and diverting rabbit trails is some of the best and most important history ever written. He shows those who would do history after him what they were to strive for. It is in the opening lines of the Histories where Herodotus establishes the scope and purpose of history, and in doing so establishes its role in man’s attempt to understand his world.

The lines which begin the Histories are a model of clarity and simplicity. There is no excess rhetoric, no flowery overstatement. Herodotus states succinctly in the above passage the purpose for his account. His “enquiries” (ἱστορία) were made to serve memory and understanding—memory in preserving the deeds of men, understanding in examining how the circumstances of those actions came about.

Herodotus’ treatment of memory in this passage is more than just a simple remembrance. He is doing more than just recording a how, where, and when. The preservation of memory here is active, even aggressive, as if time were attempting to destroy the things of man, and history is a brandished weapon holding it at bay.

Almost as an afterthought, Herodotus appends onto his paean to memory a secondary goal. Among the matters covered will be “…the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and non-Greeks.” This is just casually thrown in as if to remind you to look for it along the way. Here Herodotus is understating his purpose, and by playing down this item, he shows its importance. The discovery of the causes of action, and why men have acted as they have, is the heart of the study of history.

So what is the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and the non-Greeks? What was the spark that began the fire that led the largest army in antiquity to cross from Asia to Europe in order to subdue the cities of Attica and the Peloponnese? Herodotus’ examination of this is more subtle than some will give him credit for, and is composed of one part scholarly guile, and one part showmanship. He will look at the opinions of the Asians and the Greeks, and then settle on the pattern that will lead him through his entire enquiry.

“According to learned Persians, it was the Phoenicians who caused the conflict....”1 So begins Herodotus’ examination of the causes of the great conflict. Right away, he is already showing historians their business - he is sourcing his work. He is telling you whose opinion he is working with. As he proceeds, he relates the Persians’ story of Phoenicians going to Argos and abducting Io. In a turnabout, some Greeks go to Tyre and abduct Europa, while some others go to Colchis and abduct Princess Medea (there is some confusion amongst the Persians as to whether the former group were properly Greek, or Cretan). All of the second round of abductors justify their actions by pointing to Io’s earlier capture.

Finally, the son of the Trojan king, Alexander (Paris), abducts Helen from her home in Sparta. At this point, according to the Persians, the Greeks gain culpability, for “…so far it had only been a matter of abducting women from one another, but the Greeks…took the initiative and launched a military strike against Persia.”2

While it is true that the Persians viewed this kind of rapacious activity to be illegal, they found the Greek reaction to Helen’s abduction odd because, “…it is stupid to get worked up about it....“ They viewed the Greek reaction to be unjust and “…date the origin of their hostility towards the Greece from the fall of Illium.” 3

After sourcing these opinions, and running through them, Herodotus gives his own opinion: forget the abductions; they are not the issue.


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What religion did the Persian ruler Darius I promote?
    6·1 answer
  • According to the passage, why did Blair hold a sit-in?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the importance of the scientific revolution
    9·2 answers
  • Que fue la operación barbarroja?
    6·1 answer
  • QUESTION 23
    10·1 answer
  • Who proposed the idea of uniformitarianism first? A. Charles Lyell B. James Hutton C. Jean Baptiste Lamarck D. Charles Darwin
    12·1 answer
  • What aggressive military policies did the Japanese take part in that laid the foundation of the Axis
    7·2 answers
  • What powers could a pope use to make kings obey his orders?<br><br> PLEASE HURRY
    13·2 answers
  • Thomas Jefferson tried to end...
    11·1 answer
  • - What were the countries of Britain, France, Belgium, Russia, and Serbia called during WWI?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!