Answer:
$62 million
Explanation:
Adjustments for non-cash effects:
= Amortization expense - Gain on the sale of land
= $2 million - $1 million
= $1 million
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
= Decrease in accounts receivable - Decrease in accounts payable + Decrease in inventory
= $2 million - $5 million + $4 million
= $1 million
Net cash flows from operating activities:
= Net income + Adjustments for non-cash effects + Changes in operating assets and liabilities
= $60 million + $1 million + $1 million
= $62 million
Answer:
The total cost will be "$1,279,286.25".
Explanation:
The total cost at 125000 Km will be:

($)
The total cost at 90000 Km will be:

($)
The variable cost will be:

($)
Now,
Fixed cost = 
= 
=
($)
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
<span>a contractionary fiscal policy that will shift the aggregate demand curve to the left by an amount equal to the initial change in investment times the spending multiplier.</span>