Answer:
The correct option is;
c. Because the p-value of 0.1609 is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. We conclude the data provide convincing evidence that the mean amount of juice in all the bottles filled that day does not differ from the target value of 275 milliliters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we have the values
μ = 275 mL
275.4
276.8
273.9
275
275.8
275.9
276.1
Sum = 1928.9
Mean (Average), = 275.5571429
Standard deviation, s = 0.921696159
We put the null hypothesis as H₀: μ₁ = μ₂
Therefore, the alternative becomes Hₐ: μ₁ ≠ μ₂
The t-test formula is as follows;

Plugging in the values, we have,
Test statistic = 1.599292
at 7 - 1 degrees of freedom and α = 0.05 = ±2.446912
Our p-value from the the test statistic = 0.1608723≈ 0.1609
Therefore since the p-value = 0.1609 > α = 0.05, we fail to reject our null hypothesis, hence the evidence suggests that the mean does not differ from 275 mL.
306/6 is 51 is you add one to one side and take away the other the six numbers become: 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56 as you added one to one side substituting the other you took away from, therefore the smallest would be 46.
The answer is $12792
Explanation:
It is known Tessa pays $108.00 to contribute to family coverage every two weeks and this represents 18% of the total payment. This implies the employer pays the 82% missing (100% - 18% = 82%). Additionally, with this information, it is possible to know the amount the employer has to pay every two weeks that represents 82%. The process is shown below:
1. Write the values you know and use x to represent the value you need to find
108 = 18
x = 82
3. Cross multiply
x 18 = 8856
4. Find the value of x by solving this simple equation
x = 8856 ÷ 18
x = 492 - Amount the employer pays every two weeks for Tessa's family coverage
Now that we know the money the employer pays every two weeks, it is possible to calculate the annual amount of money. Follow the process below.
1. Consider one year has a total of 52 weeks and divide this number of weeks by 2 because the payment for the family coverage occurs every 2 weeks
52 ÷ 2 = 26
2. Finally, multiply the money paid by the employer every two weeks by 26
26 weeks x $492 = $12792- This is the total the employer pays annually
Answer:
B and C work. A and D do not.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is one of those questions that you have to go through each answer to see what the results are. You don't have to go far to eliminate A and D so let's do that first.
A]
5n + 6
Let n = 1
5(1) + 6
5 + 6= 11
However there is trouble beginning with n = 2
5*2 + 6
10 + 6
16 All you need is one wrong answer and the choice is toast. So A won't work.
================
Try D
6(n - 1)+ 5
n=0
6*(-1) + 5
-6 + 5
- 1
And D has been eliminated with just 1 attempt. n= 2 or n = 1 would be even worse. D is not one of the answers.
=============
B
Let n = 1
6(1) + 5
6 + 5
11 The first term works.
n = 2
6*(2) + 5
12 + 5
17 and n = 2 works as well. Just in case it is hard to believe, let's try n = 3 because so far, everything is fine.
n = 3
6*(3) + 5
18 + 5
23 And this also works. I'll let you deal with n = 4
========
C
n = 0
6(0 + 1) + 5
6*1 + 5
6 + 5
11
n = 1
6(1 + 1) + 5
6*2 + 5
12 + 5
17 which works.
So C is an answer.
Answer:
Approximately 0.333
Step-by-step explanation:
If we graph this we see that the line goes over the y-axis at (0,0.333)
*I use desmos graphing calculator*