billy stacked six pieces of wood on top of one another if each piece was three quarts of a foot tall how tall was his pile

olga55 [171]

Answer:

20 million = 2 crore

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we will show you how to convert 20 million to crores (twenty million in crores). This may be useful if you for example want to convert 20 million rupees to crore rupees or 20 million dollars to crore dollars.

In some parts of the world like the United States, large numbers are separated with commas in three-digit-interval format like this:

...,BBB,MMM,TTT,HHH

BBB = billions

MMM = millions

TTT = thousands

HHH = hundreds

In certain parts of Asia, the format is a little different. From right to left, it starts out with three digits followed by a comma like the US, but after that, it is in intervals of two digits like this:

..,AA,CC,LL,TT,HHH

AA = arabs

CC = crores

LL = lakhs

TT = thousands

HHH = hundreds

Below we have displayed 20 million with the two number systems, based on the information above:

MM,TTT,HHH

20,000,000

=

C,LL,TT,HHH

2,00,00,000

When you match up 20 million with the C,LL,TT,HHH format above, you can see what 20 million is in crores. The answer to 20 million in crores is as follows:

20 million

= 2 crore

4 0

3 years ago

Can someone explain this to me

Lynna [10]

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{\sf tan \ 28 = x / 14}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Since opposite and adjacent is given, we will use tan as trigonometric ratio.

Hence,

opposite = x , adjacent = 14 and $\theta$ = 28

So,

$\sf tan \theta = opposite / adjacent$

tan 28 = x / 14

$\rule[225]{225}{2}$

Hope this helped!

7 0

2 years ago

Stefan sells Jim a bicycle for $175 and a helmet for $17. The total cost for Jim is 160% of what Stefan spent originally to buy

Nady [450]

Answer:

Stefan spend $120 originally.

Stefan made $72 by selling bicycle and helmet to Jim.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Cost of bicycle = $175

Cost of Helmet = $17

Percent of total cost of Jim = 160% of original cost of Stefan

We need to find the Amount Stefan spend originally and money he made by selling the bicycle and helmet to Jim.

Solution:

Let the Amount Stefan spend originally be 'x'.

Total Cost of Jim is equal to sum of Cost of bicycle and Cost of Helmet.

framing in equation form we get;

Total Cost of Jim = $175+17 =\$192$

Now we know that;

Total Cost of Jim is equal to 160% of Amount Stefan spend originally.

framing in equation form we get;

$192 = \frac{160}{100}\times x\\\\192 =1.6x$

Dividing both side by 1.6 we get;

$\frac{192}{1.6}=\frac{1.6x}{1.6}\\\\x= \$120$

Hence Stefan spend $120 originally.

Now we can say that;

Money Stefan made is equal to Money Stefan spend originally minus Total Cost of Jim.

framing in equation form we get;

Money Stefan made = $192-120 =\$72$

Hence Stefan made $72 by selling bicycle and helmet to Jim.

7 0

3 years ago

Solve the equation: x2 - 12x = -36

Natalija [7]

$x^2-12x=-36\ \ \ |add\ 36\ to\ both\ sides\\\\x^2-12x+36=0\\\\x^2-2x\cdot6+6^2=0\ \ |use\ (a-b)^2=a^2-2ab+b^2\\\\(x-6)^2=0\iff x-6=0\ \ \ |add\ 6\ to\ both\ sides\\\\\boxed{x=6}$

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to the University of Nevada Center for Logistics Management, 6% of all mer-

Fudgin [204]

Answer:

a) The point estimate of the proportion of items returned for the population of

sales transactions at the Houston store = 12/80 = 0.15

b) The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of returns at the Houston store = [0.0718 < p < 0.2282].

c) Yes.

We set an hypothesis and construct a test statistics. The test statistics result gives us:

Z calculated = 2.2545, and this gives us the p-value = 0.0121. We assumed 95% confident interval. Hence, the level of significance (α) = 5%. Conclusively, since the p-value ==> 0.0121 is less than (α) = 5%, the test is significant. Hence, the proportion of returns at the Houston store is significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Point estimate of the proportion = number of returned items/ total items sold = 12/80 = 0.15.

b) By formula of confident interval:

CI(95%) = p ± Z* $\sqrt{\frac{p*(1-p)}{n} } = 0.15 \pm 1.96 *\sqrt{\frac{0.15*(1-0.15)}{80} }$ ,

CI(95%) = [0.0718 < p < 0.2282]

c) The hypothesis:

$H_{0}$ : The proportion of returns at the Houston store is not significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole.

$H_{a}$ : The proportion of returns at the Houston store is significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole.

The test statistics:

Z = $\frac{\hat{p} - p_{0}}{\sqrt{\frac{p*(1-p)}{n} }}$ , where $p_{0}$ is the proportion of nation returns.

Z calculated = 2.2545, and this gives us the p-value = 0.0121. We assumed 95% confident interval. Hence, the level of significance (α) = 5%. Conclusively, since the p-value ==> 0.0121 is less than (α) = 5%, the test is significant. Hence, the proportion of returns at the Houston store is significantly different from the returns for the nation as a whole.

6 0

3 years ago