The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Incomplete question, however here's what I could infer from George's statements in the text.
<u> </u><u>Explanation:</u>
According to George, the way nonprofit organizations depict poverty in their publicity materials specifically from 3rd world countries isn't doesn't portray the entire the picture. In her words, she said, "all these organizations depict the worst of the issue, hoping that people will reach out and donate to their projects...though this may they helpful and they do reach their monetary goal, <em>they are not portraying the other side of poverty that may not be as severe.." </em>
Answer:
She was the Goddess of family, hearth, and home.
Explanation:
It meant something to people
Alexander Hamilton and his followers favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant they believed that the document permitted everything that it did not expressly forbid
