Answer:
If I bougth the Machine at 14% interest.
This purchase is not justified
Depreciation expenses and credit interest are greater than the income generated
Explanation:
Machine 360000
Adittional cost 20000
Final Cost 380000
Salvage Value 73000
Machine value for depreciation 307000
year 1 307000 61400 245600
year 2 245600 61400 184200
year 3 184200 61400 122800
year 4 122800 61400 61400
year 5 61400 61400 0
Period Payment Capital Interest Loan
360000
1 104.862 54.462 50.400 305.538
2 104.862 62.087 42.775 243.451
3 104.862 70.779 34.083 172.672
4 104.862 80.688 24.174 91.984
5 104.862 91.984 12.878 0
Depreciation 307000
Interes 164.310
Expenses 471.310
Revenue 430.000
Answer: $320
Explanation:
The Profit as the question shows is the Total Revenue less the total cost.
Total Revenue.
This will be the amount of goods sold multiplied by the price they are sold at.
The monopolist maximises output where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost which from the graph is 4 units.
The price they sell at is the intersection of this quantity with the demand curve which is at $120.
Total Revenue = Units Sold * Price
= 4 * 120
= $480
Total Cost
The total cost will be the average cost per unit multiplied by the number of units sold. The relevant average cost is the cost associated with the maximised out of 4 units which according to the graph is $40.
= Average cost * number of units
= 40 * 4
= $160
Profit = 480 - 160
= $320
Answer:
c. Erie s ROE will remain the same
Explanation:
As the return on asset is calcualte using the asset figure it will not change with a financial leverage measurement.
As the financial leverage acts in the composition of other side of the accounting (assets = liabilitis + equity) it will change the return on equity, the debt ratio and other metric related to this side but, not the return on assets.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given: The company's market share had changed from 40 to 21 percentage points.
To find: percent change in market share
Solution:
Change in percentage of company's market share 
Percent change in market share = (Change in percentage of company's market share ÷ 40) × 100
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
