Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
Particulars 2021 2022 2023
Beginning Inventory <u>277</u> <u>253</u> 235
Cost of Goods sold 633 623 <u> </u><u>586</u>
Ending inventory <u> </u><u>253 </u> 235 220
Cost of good available for sale 886 <u>876</u><u> </u> 806
Purchases 640 <u>623 </u> 595
Purchase discounts 20 17 <u>26</u>
Purchase returns 26 32 16
Freight-in 15 34 18
Explanation:
There are few missing values which are calculated using back solving technique. These values are bold and underlined. Playa Company has missing information for its three year accounts.
Available for sale = Beginning inventory + Net Purchases
Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of good available for Sales - Ending inventory
Ending inventory = Cost of Goods available for Sales - Cost of Goods Sold.
Net purchases = Gross purchases + Freight in - Purchase discount - Purchase return
It would most likely be the GPU.
