<span>17 1/3 + (-50 1/3) -5 1/2
= -33 - 5 1/2
= (</span>-33 ) + ( - 5 1/2)
<span>= -38 1/2
</span>
Answer:
it a or the first one or whatevr u wanna call it jsut #1
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The roots of the quadratic function (x-intercepts) are
x=-1 and x=5/3
so
we can write the equation of the parabola as
where
a is a coefficient
Remember that
The parabola pass through the point (5,40)
substitute the value of x and the value of y of the ordered pair in the quadratic equation and solve for a
x=5, y=40
substitute
apply distributive property
see the attached figure to better understand the problem
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's solve for C.
Step 1: Flip the equation.
Step 2: Add 
to both sides.
Step 3: Divide both sides by 
.
Answer:
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
