Answer: $4,331
Step-by-step explanation:
I will assume that the question meant 5.2% not 52% as this is quite excessive.
Katherine after 13 years.
Convert the variables;
n = 13 years = 13 * 365 = 4,745 days
r = 5.2% = 5.2/365 = 5.2/365%
Future value = P * ( 1 + r)^n
= 86,000 * (1 + 5.2/365%)⁴⁷⁴⁵
= $169,068
Michael after 13 years;
If compounded continuously, the formula is;
Future value = Pe^rt
= 86,000 * e⁰.⁰⁵ ˣ ¹³
= $164,737
Difference = 169,068 - 164,737
= $4,331
Answer:
A. is less than the radius.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on 100 trials, we don't expect the experimental probability to deviate much from the theoretical probability. The scales on the attached graphs are hard to read, but you want to choose the graph that ...
- has bars that total 100 in their length
- has bars that are approximately .50, .25, .17, .08 in height, corresponding to the area fraction
We think the appropriate choice may be C, but we cannot tell for sure.
(3x - 1) + 5
Hope this helps!
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can always separate an equation into two parts and see where those graphs intersect.
Joel's method works well.
_____
<em>Additional comments</em>
Preston should know that the invention of logarithms makes it easy to solve equations like this. x = log₂(14) = log(14)/log(2) ≈ 3.8073549.
As for Joel's method, I prefer to subtract the right side to get the equation ...
2^x -14 = 0
Then graphing y = 2^x -14, I look for the x-intercept. Most graphing calculators make it easy to find x- and y-intercepts. Not all make it easy to find points of intersection between different curves.