<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>
The correct answer is C. They are going down by 3.
Answer:n= 1/3d - 2/3m
Step-by-step explanation:
d=2m+3n
Step 1: Flip the equation.
2m+3n=d
Step 2: Add -2m to both sides.
2m+3n+−2m=d+−2m
3n=d−2m
Step 3: Divide both sides by 3.
3n/3 = d-2m/3
Therefore
n= 1/3d - 2/3m
Hope this helps!
Plz name brainliest if possible.
1jaiz4 and 1 more users found this answer helpful
THANKS
1
5.0
(1 vote)
Add comment
Answer
0
maxtext75
Helping Hand
15 answers
26 people helped
Answer:
n = d - 2m
3*
Step-by-step explanation:
First we want to get n alone on one side, so we should subtract 2m from both side;
d = 2m + 3n
3n = d - 2m
Now to get n by itself, we need to divide by 3 from both sides;
3n = d - 2m
n = d - 2m
3*
*Pretend there is a fraction bar between d - 2m and 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
a = 2 and b= 3
(a + b)2
(2 + 3)2
10