Answer:
They provide false reasons in support of a claim, making the writer seem less credible.
Explanation:
The use of fallacy is using faulty arguments to support the opinion. At the first glance, the fallacious opinion can seem better than it is, but it is not supported by facts, and the reader can have the feeling the writer is dishonest.
By using fallacies, the writer is discrediting his work and words.
Answer:
what is the question can you tell me
Answer:
Judge Patterson’s background illustrates the entrenched culture that makes it difficult to secure justice for Walter. By resisting de-segregation, which was a federally issued mandate, Patterson demonstrated his willingness to break the law in order to preserve the practice of discriminating against black people. Stevenson’s arguments, which claim that Walter’s conviction was faulty because of racial bias and illegal proceedings, likely seem irrelevant to Patterson, who has demonstrated his loyalty to racist traditions over the law. Patterson isn’t the first person in the book to question where Stevenson is from: this illustrates the importance that Stevenson places on the anti-outsider mentality he encountered in Southern courts.
Explanation:
