Answer:
Option (D) is the right answer.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the most appropriate answer is option ( D) because Stanley smith is a customer of the bank as he has a checking account in the bank.
While the other options are wrong because of the following reasons:
- Option (A) is incorrect because the company lucky licks Inc. is the customer of the bank, not any person.
- Option (B) is incorrect because Cara is not the customer of the bank as she only uses the bank's ATM.
- Option (C) is incorrect because Herman is not the customer of the bank as he only cashes his checks in the bank.
Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
Answer:
If negative externalities pop up in a market, the equilibrium is higher than the efficient output.
Thus when it comes to the government rectification regarding the side effects of that commercial , activity, if the amount of bags is (1) then the new equilibrium would be: <em>p*= $17</em>
<span>Date of record is the date the corporation records which stockholders get dividend checks.
</span>
So the answer is B
<span />
