Answer:
(A) $390,000
Explanation:
Under LIFO method as the name suggests "Last In First Out"
the goods purchased in Last that is latest are sold first, that is goods purchased in 2015 will be sold first, therefore in the given case at the end of 2014 using LIFO we have,
Balance = $390,000
Because balance of goods purchased in 2014 i.e. $756,000 is sold first in 2014 remaining inventory at year end will be of 2013
Correct option is
(A) $390,000
Aggregate demand left.
<h3>What Is a Supply Shock?</h3>
A supply shock is an unanticipated occurrence that abruptly alters the supply of a good or commodity, causing an unanticipated shift in price. Supply shocks can be positive, resulting in an increased supply, or negative, resulting in a lower supply; however, they are frequently negative. A negative (or adverse) supply shock drives up the price of a product, whereas a positive supply shock drives it down, assuming that overall demand remains constant.
A shift in the supply curve to the right caused by an increase in output and a positive supply shock lowers prices, whereas a reduction in production and a negative supply shock raises prices. Any unforeseen event that reduces output or upsets the supply chain has the potential to cause supply shocks.
To know more about supply shock visit:
brainly.com/question/26847052
#SPJ4
1. In the criminal justice system, John can temporarily put Jack in custody pending the arrival of the police. Jack was not detained for a period longer than five minutes and not for a civil wrong.
Thus, in this lawsuit for the tort of unlawful imprisonment, Jack will lose because he committed a crime. He cannot apply a civil law to a criminal case.
2. Adriana is correct that her personal assets cannot be reached in this lawsuit brought by the shareholders of DEF, Inc. because SLA Accountants, LLP is a limited liability partnership and not just an ordinary partnership.
A limited liability partnership, like a limited liability company, offers members limited liability. However, the shareholders of DEF, Inc. may decide to sue Adriana personally.
3. Andrew is wrong because the car handed over by Sam was not a completed inter-vivos gift. The transfer was not absolute but conditional upon Sam not returning from the Middle East.
As a conditional transfer of gift, the vesting of the ownership interest created by the transfer depends on the fulfillment of a condition.
Thus, since the transfer condition did not materialize, Andrew should return the car to Sam in good faith.
Learn more about inter vivos gifts and limited liability partnerships here brainly.com/question/14767795 and brainly.com/question/1166757
Answer:
c) The current ratio
Explanation:
The current ratio is an example of a liquidity ratio.
Liquidity ratios measure a company's ability to meet its short term obligations.
Current ratio = curernt assets / current liabilities
Return on assets is a profitability ratio. It measures return on investment
The other ratios are coverage ratios. They measure the ability of the firm to covert its debts payments
