The pressure to loosen clean air standards is based in allegations that the standards affect industry development and economy because the adjustments require further modernization and some industry even need to change their whole machinery or line production to be able to meet the legal requirements, as for the car industry, slowing down production or increasing costs.
In short-term that is very likely to be true, the industry will have to do some investment, but the price will be lower than the long-term cost of keeping up polluting the air.
The clean air standards should not be loosen because loosen the standards will benefits only specific groups and temporary, later and in other domains the loosen of the standards will affects human and other animals quality of life and environment. The economic impact will be seen later on healthy sector, food sector as agriculture and livestock, in nature disaster and in the lack of natural resources due to dramatic landscape changes.
We should not think about just economic impact of now when taking this decisions but we should consider systematic risks and consequences of supporting the loosen of clean air standards.
We must keep in mind that some process in nature are irreversible and when one action as the pollution of air is impacting towards things we will not be able to revert anymore the cost will be much higher in future than is now to adapt to the clean standards.
Answer:
According to the pluralist theory of government, government policy is formed as a result of the competition between groups with different goals and interests.
Explanation:
Political pluralism is an ideological principle that considers the division of society into different social groups with different ideas and interests as a strength and not as a weakness.
Unlike elitist theory, pluralism recognizes the participation of several groups that are not necessarily part of the elite. The parties that compete in pluralism are characterized by ideological and social heterogeneity, regardless of the economic resources they possess. It is also opposed to populism for the same reason that opposes elitism: because both defend a dualistic view of society.
The fourth step of bystander intervention process helps to determine if they are the best person to act.
The act of people or groups who are willing to actively and openly speak out against sexual harassment is known as bystander intervention. It is everyone of our responsibilities as members of the community to take action to stop sexual or dating violence and support individuals who are impacted by these behaviours before, during, or after an occurrence.
There are several ways you may make a difference if you see these events taking place or if someone asks for your assistance.
When deciding whether or not to take action, a typical spectator will go through 5 stages:
- Consider that the occurrence calls for action and take the initiative to do so
- possess the capacity for bystander intervention
- meddle in the issue in reality
To learn more about bystander intervention, refer
brainly.com/question/28296255
#SPJ4
Senators serve for 6 years at a time, I believe is the answer you're looking for.
