Answer:
Conflict
Explanation:
In general terms, we can see that sociological perspectives focus on two opposing themes: While the structural or functionalist approach views society as composed of varios parts, having each a function that when fullfilled , it makes a contribution to the society's equilibrium.
The kurds have a long history as ethnic group , being in middle east. Bein identified themsevles apart from Arabic majorities and having a more progressive , secular, and western orientation, they fail still to be recognized as a state nation.
This is why Conflict theorists would argue in the case of Kurds:
Why the society has failed or why kurds have not been assimilated and giving a function and meaning?
Then they would see society as divided into groups each with different power and resources that are in a dynamic of constant struggle and exploit with one another (Turkey vs Kurds)
Answer:
first
Explanation:
But that's the thesis. What you do is write a claim in the thesis and in the third/ second para explain it. But in reality if this essay is English: you need 3 claims.
The Neolithic men (and women) had huge nasal cavities so they had a superior sense of smell; they adapted to use their teeth as weapons, like for tearing flesh or sharpening wood; and they all adapted to making weapons and tools out of wood and stone, some better and sharper than the ones we have today.
