After having done this on paper:
We want to isolate the variable, and the first step is to subtract the 8.
Since the <em>n</em> is being multiplied by 3, and that = 8, we can multiply both sides by 3.
<em>n</em> = 24
Let me know if this helped you understand better.
Also, you can check this by substituting in 24 for <em>n</em>.
Answer:
S44.10
Step-by-step explanation:
20% of 52 is 41.6
6% of 41.6 is 2.49600 US$ which rounds to 2.50
2.50+41.6=44.1
$44.10
Based on the information given, it can be noted that the problem with the research is the problem of validity.
<h3>
Problems with validity.</h3>
It should be noted that in a research, a problem with validity takes place when there's a lack of reliability of the independent variable.
Also, it is a result of lack of representativeness of the independent variable and a lack of impact of the independent variable.
In this case, the researcher sets out to measure drug use on US college campuses by asking a representative sample of undergraduates whether they are currently receiving federal grants or loans. It should be noted that the question asked doesn't relate to the research.
In conclusion, there's a problem with validity.
Learn more about researches on:
brainly.com/question/25257437
The range of the function is all real numbers greater than 0.
As the domain values increase, the range values decrease.
Each successive output is the previous output divided by 3.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
When multiplying two exponential numbers you add their powers together : (n3)(n7) = n10
so the expression is false
