Answer: C. . increase the quantity supplied of X and decrease the quantity demanded of X.
Explanation:
If the demand and supply curves for product X are stable, a goverment mandated increase in the price of X will result into the increase the quantity supplied of X and decrease the quantity demanded of X.
This is because when there is a rise in price, the suppliers will be willing to supply more while the consumers will demand less of the product.
Answer:
The elimination of the North division would result in an increase to net operating income of $100,000 for the South division.
Explanation:
Please see computation of the company's overall net profit
= South sales - South variable costs - South traceable fixed costs - South allocated common corporate cost - North allocated common corporate cost
= $880,000 - $550,000 - $80,000 - $50,000 - $100,000
= $100,000 profit.
N.B
Since the North division has been eliminated, all the items for North division would all be ignored except its allocated common corporate cost.
Coca Cola? I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure
Answer:
0.25 or 25%
Explanation:
The computation of the gross profit rate is shown below:
Gross profit rate = Gross profit ÷ Net sales revenue
where,
Net sales revenue = Sales revenue - Sales Returns and Allowances - Sales Discounts
= $2,000,000 - $250,000 - $50,000
= $1,700,000
And, the Cost of goods sold is $1,275,000
So, the gross profit is
= $1,700,000 - $1,275,000
= $425,000
So, the gross profit rate is
= $425,000 ÷ $1,700,000
= 0.25 or 25%
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
