All categories

3 years ago

Why was Frederick Von Hayek against government intervention in an economy

2 answers:

8 0

For Friedrich Von Hayek less government intervention mean't more economic freedom he believed that if people are free to choose then the economy runs more efficiently also would improve the economy situation.

malfutka [58]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

It would reduce people’s economic freedom.

Explanation:

This is 100% the right answer because I got this question on a test and this was correct.

~Please mark me brainliest :)

You might be interested in

Which of the following events are examples of positive social media coverage?

swat32

- xcorporation announces the launch of its latest headphones on social media websites
-a video featuring xcorporation talking about its new headphones goes viral

7 0

3 years ago

Jane transferred a piece of real estate to her son Christopher 6 months ago. Jane purchased the real estate for $90,000 six year

goldenfox [79]

Answer:

c. Christopher will have a dual basis for income tax purposes.

Explanation:

Due to the fact that the basis of Jane in the specific property was higher than the FMV of the property on the specific date that she gave out the property, therefore, the double basis principle will apply to Christopher. In addition, Christoper will not collect any additional basis for the tax paid on the gift. The correct answer is option c.

7 0

3 years ago

Jasper makes a $44,000, 90-day, 9% cash loan to Clayborn Company. Jasper's entry to record the collection of the note and intere

vovikov84 [41]

Jasper's entry to record the collection of the note and interest at maturity should be:

Debit Cash Account 44,990

Credit Interest Income $990

Credit Notes Receivable $43,000

The amount collected is:

Cash collected

= $44,000 Amount lend + Interest Income

And

Interest Income

= Amount lend * Interest Percent * For the days / 360

= $44,000 * 9% * 90 / 360

= $990

Now putting the interest income value in the above equation, we have:

Cash collected

= $44,000 Amount lend + $990

= $44,990

So the cash is increase by $44,990 interest income increased is by $990 and the Note receivable is at amount issued which has been decreased by $44,000.

Learn more about Journal entry here: brainly.com/question/14972126

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Assume the market basket contains 20X, 30Y, and 50Z. The current-year prices for goods X, Y, and Z are $2, $6, and $10, respecti

Aneli [31]

Answer:

CPI for the current year = 200

Explanation:

Given;

Contents in market basket

20X, 30Y, and 50Z

The current-year prices for goods

X = $2

Y = $6

Z = $10

The base-year prices are

X = $1

Y = $3

Z = $5

Now,

Total cost of market basket in the current year

= ∑ (Quantity × Price)

= 20 × $2 + 30 × $6 + 50 × $10

= $40 + $180 + $500

= $720

Total cost of market basket in the base year

= ∑ (Quantity × Price)

= 20 × $1 + 30 × $3 + 50 × $5

= $20 + $90 + $250

= $360

also,

CPI for the current year = $\frac{\textup{Cost of market basket at current year prices}}{\textup{Cost of market basket at base year prices}}\times100$

CPI for the current year = $\frac{\$720}{\$360}\times100$

CPI for the current year = 200

8 0

3 years ago

The development costs were incurred after technological and commercial feasibility was established and after the future economic

Anarel [89]

Complete Question:

Pribuss Engineering prepares its financial statements according to International Financial Reporting Standards. During 2018, the company incurred the following costs related to a new product design:

Research for New Design $2.4M

DVMPT of New Product $1.3M

Patent Filing Fees $52K

The development costs were incurred after technological and commercial feasibility was established and after the future economic benefits were deemed probable. The project was successfully completed and the new product was patented before the end of the 2018 fiscal year. What amount should Pribuss expense in its 2018 income statement related to the above expenditures?

Answer:

The Research expenses of $2.4M that are written as expense in the Income statement and the Development costs of $1.3M and patent legal fees of $53k are capitalized.

Explanation:

The reason is that the International Standard IAS 38 Intangible Assets says that the expenditure incurred on the research that hasn't entered development phase must be written as expense in the year and the expenditure incurred on the development phase of the research outcomes must be capitalized to the extent it is ready for use. In this case $1.3M is clearly a development cost and patent legal fees of $53k is the expenditure that will prepare the asset and making it ready for use, so it must also be capitalized.

8 0

3 years ago