Question

A man is on trial for the murder of his wife. The prosecution on this case would like to bring forward an expert in the field of ballistics to prove the bullet found at the crime scene was that of the defendant. This ballistics expert has a PhD in forensic science and has worked at the Ballistics Dept. at the Forensic Center in Houston, TX for 25 years. His methods are widely accepted in the scientific community. The judge finds his testimony to be relevant and allows his testimony to be heard. Which correctly describes the admissibility of this expert's testimony?
A) Frye standard
B) Daubert ruling
C) Miranda rights
D) Ballistics rule

Answer 1

I would say b ballistic rule I thinks