Answer:
Raw materials were vital during the First World War. Due to the armaments production, the belligerents’ needs increased significantly, while the available resources fell.
Explanation:
Each country intended both to increase its resources and to use them more efficiently. This required broad state intervention that consisted in controlling the needs of domestic populations and administering the distribution of products. Raw materials were also at the core of the Allied cooperation to provide Europe and North America with all necessary supplies. This leads to the question of whether the war led to a change in the global trade of raw materials.
Answer:
Ergot Poisoning.
Explanation:
Ergot is UNSAFE. There is a high risk of poisoning, and it can be fatal. Early symptoms of poisoning include nausea, vomiting, muscle pain and weakness, numbness, itching, and rapid or slow heartbeat. Ergot poisoning can progress to gangrene, vision problems, confusion, spasms, convulsions, unconsciousness, and death.
No. I don't because of the way politics are going. Political advisers should be able to make the decision on how many member go in every 2 years.
The correct answer is <span>all men of conscience or prudence ply to windward, to maintain their wars be defensive. They would always pretend that the Natives attacked first and that they were savages who pillage their lands, so they would have an excuse to attack while pretending that they're on the defensive.</span>
