It is more than just a quadrilateral. In fact it is going to be hard to pick.
These facts suit a square, a rectangle, a rhombus, and a parallelogram. And the above statement is true, but maybe a little harder to prove than the converse of the statement, which is the usual one you find.
The converse is "If you have a parallelagram, the diagonals bisect each other."
You might think a trapezoid deserves some mention. The diagonals of a trapezoid do not bisect each other.
You use division
over 2 or 4 or 3 or 5 or 7 and so on
in this case 2 is good
64 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 ( use division) = 2^6
16 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 = 2^4
number reminder
64 0
32 0
16 0
8 0
4 0
2 0
1 1
so 64 = 2^6 (number of zeros) no reminder
The line which rises to the left has slope of -1/3 and y intercept of 2 so we have
y = -1/3x + 2
3y = -x + 6
x + 3y = 6
Shading is below and the line is solid so the inequality is
x + 3y ≤ 6
The other line has equation
y = 3x - 1
and inequality is
y ≥ 3x - 1
The answer is B
Answer:
4 pieces for the shelves
Step-by-step explanation:
3/4×4=3
Marginal anylasis is thinking at the margin or when right before you will make the choice
A.
producing another car
depends on how fast you can product, I don't think it is very fast, so no
B.
this is marginal thinking, you already have the pizza in front of you
c. same as A, not
D. you are already buying one
B and D
