Answer:
$20,000
Explanation:
GDP is the market value of <u>all final goods and
</u>
<u>services</u> produced within a country in a given period of time.
The GDP includes only the value of final goods, <em>the value of manufactured automobile in this question</em>, not the value of intermediate goods used in it, <em>the windshield, tires, and others.</em>
Reason: The price of intermediate goods (windshield, tires, CD player) is already included in the final price of $20,000.
Hence, GDP discourage to include these intermediate goods value as it will lead to double counting given that they're already included in final price of $20,000.
Answer:
If the effective tax rate increases then the net savings coming from investments will get lowered as a result the investment will have higher payback period (The increase in effective tax rate would lower demand of the product which means there is decline in net saving arising from the sale of the product). Likewise this decrease in annual net savings will also decrease the internal rate of return which shows that their are increased chances of project rejections. The NPV method is based on cash flows and relevant costing just like IRR and payback method but the only difference is that it assumes that the cash earned would be reinvested at cost of capital. The NPV will also decrease due to increased effective tax rate.
Answer:
$480
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Machine Hours Repair Costs
2,400 $6,385
1,200 $3,480
2,000 $5,285
3,400 $8,980
Now,
Machine Hours Repair Costs
Highest 3,400 $8,980
Lowest 1,200 $3,480
Difference 2,200 $5,500
Unit variable cost = $5,500 ÷ 2,200
= $2.5
Total cost at high level = $8,980
Machine hours highest level = 3,400
Also,
Total cost at high level = Fixed cost + Variable cost at highest level
or
$8,980 = Fixed cost + [ $2.5 × 3,400 ]
or
Fixed cost = $8,980 - [ $2.5 × 3,400 ]
= $8,980 - $8,500
= $480
Answer: The third option (option C) is the right answer.
Explanation:
The paragraph which has the best coherence is option C. This is because in the case of the third option, it explains that the flow of ideas is constant from one sentence to another.
The first sentence serves as an introduction which talked about the reasons why duties should be divided based on each member’s expertise. The sentences moved smoothly and also logically from one sentence to another sentence. An example is the sentence that “if your company does not have a public relations executive…..”. This should logically proceed the sentence that says that communication ought to be overseen by the director of PR.
This shows that the third option possesses a consistent and logical train of thought as well.
It's a method where <span>subordinates share a significant degree of decision-making power with their immediate superiors
One positive benefit of the employee involvement and participation is that companies will prepare more employees to understand the company's operational method and make more potential leaders for the company if it choose to expand in the future</span>
