Answer:
An interpreter is quite different from a complier due to the following statement below:
O. An interpreter translates and executes code line by line, while a compiler translates all code at once so that it is ready to be executed at any time.
Explanation:
For an interpreter, it works in translating and execution of the codes line after another line. In a situation where there is a mistake in the code, the next line would not be able to be executed, but rather display error message. On the other hand, compiler translate all codes at once and execute them as a single work.
<em>During its translation of the codes in compiler, should there be any error, it would not be able to execute despite the fact that, the error might be in the last line of the code.</em>
<span>You can view documents across all print queues and print devices.
</span>
In regards copyrighted works, fair use is simply known as legal dogma that allows the right to free expression by allowing the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works by individuals as regards to some certain situations.
Fair Use of copying of copyrighted material can only be used in a short and revelatory us, example to criticize, or caricature of a copyrighted work. It is often known to be a legal defense that protects individuals of copyrighted material from copyright infringement.
- Fair use allows a person/people to use a copyrighted work without acknowledgement or permission of copyright owner and it can be used to criticize, comment, news reporting, teaching, research etc. It is not seen as infringement under the law.
Conclusively, we can say that In regards copyrighted works, fair use is simply known as legal dogma that allows the right to free expression by allowing the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works by individuals as regards to some certain situations.
Learn more from:
brainly.com/question/1534807