Answer:
C) competitive <u>analysis</u>
Explanation:
A competitive analysis is a business plan part which reflects on the key competitors of our business (their key characteristics which are relevant for our business plan or product in general).
In this example, Robert would bring out the key characteristics of the construction industry (industry trends, industry segments etc.) and list out the relevant competitors and their potential <em>competitive advantage</em>. If Robert's company is a construction business specialized in skyscraper building in LA, he would list construction companies specialized in high-rise building located in California.
With the aid of a proper competitive analysis, Robert will be able to point out the business areas where it is possible to surpass our competitors. For example, when Robert decomposes the product features of the ABC competitor company - materials used, project cost, project length, skyscraper portfolio, only then he is able to see what specific area in his company needs improvement.
On the other hand, an <em>executive summary</em> is a short description of our business goals, key financial indicators, strategies and forecast. It possesses summarized key information, similar to a pitch.
Answer:
The answer is Project X is the most attractive to an investor.
Explanation:
We can use the definition of Net Present Value (NPV) to solve this problem and figure out which would be the best investment.
Net present value is the present value of future money. In other words, over certain period of time, how much is your investment worth today. It takes into consideration cash inflow and outflow over that period of time as well as interest that could be earned on alternative investments if you had the money today. See attachment to see the NPV formula.
In the attachment, we calculate the NPV for each one of the projects using a rate of return i=3% for all of them. Any rate of return could be used as long as they are the same for all projects.
A positive NPV value means a good investment and the higher that number is the better the investment. In this case, we can see that Project X has the higher NPV of all the projects. Therefore, project X is the most attractive for an investor.
Answer:
d. cost-less will go out of business, and durable will gain higher power over its customers.
Explanation:
Durable ceramics, inc will only reduce its prices if this is to its advantage. We live in a capitalist world where companies make decisions based on their own benefits. In this case, in order for Durable ceramics, inc to lower its prices and have no losses, it would expand its sales. In this way, Durable ceramics, inc would be able to capture customers from its competitors, and could make them go bankrupt.
Thus, we can conclude that if Durable ceramics, inc reduced its prices, Cost-Less would go out of business and Durable would gain greater power over its customers.
Answer:
- Gain = $271,310
- Net reduction in retained earnings = $105,690
Explanation:
Gain = (Ivanhoe market price - Purchase price) * Number of shares issued as property dividend
Purchase price = 130,000 / 16,000
= $8.13
Number of shares issued as property dividend = 130,000 shares of Concord / 10
= 13,000 Ivanhoe shares
Gain = (29 - 8.13) * 13,000
= $271,310
Net reduction in retained earnings:
= Dividends payable - Gain
= (13,000 * 29) - 271,310
= $105,690
