3 years ago

Which statement about the following argument is true?

2 answers:

7 0

1. The argument is valid by the Law of Detachment.

2. Determine the contrapositive statement of the conditional, so we have...

If you live in Idaho, then you do not live in New York City.

3. If ticket prices are low and the line to purchase them is short, then I will go to the show.

4. If Satish takes the Tuesday 8:00am Chemistry class or the Tuesday 8:00am Physics class, then he will finish the program.

STatiana [176]3 years ago

5 0

<span>D: The argument is valid but does not follow the Law of Syllogism or the Law of Detachment.
</span>

You might be interested in

X 3.6.PS-10 Question Help A new bank customer with $4,500 wants to open a money market account. The bank is offering a simple in

makkiz [27]

If it was in 10 years it would either be 2.6

4 0

3 years ago

When number can each term of the equation be multiplied by to eliminate the fractions before solving 6-3/4x+1/3=1/2x+5

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to find the least common denominator (LCD) to all the denominators of the fractions present in the equation. These denominators are (writing them in their prime factor form to make our calculations easier):

$4=2^2\\3=3\\2=2$

Therefore, we need to include a factor of 3, and two factors of 2 ( $2^2$ ) in our least common denominator, so this LCD will be a perfectly divided by all three given denominators, therefore eliminating all fractions in the equation.