Which statement about the following argument is true?
2 answers:
1. The argument is valid by the Law of Detachment.
2. Determine the contrapositive statement of the conditional, so we have...
If you live in Idaho, then you do not live in New York City.
3. If ticket prices are low and the line to purchase them is short, then I will go to the show.
4. If Satish takes the Tuesday 8:00am Chemistry class or the Tuesday 8:00am Physics class, then he will finish the program.
<span>D: The argument is valid but does not follow the Law of Syllogism or the Law of Detachment.
</span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
let sum of zeros=s
and product of zeros=p
then quadratic equation is x²-sx+p=0
x²-(-1/2)x+(-3)=0
x²+1/2 x-3=0
2x²+x-6=0
the least common multiple is 1,020 :)
Answer:
Thx for the points
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A true
Step-by-step explanation:
It is the correct answer i have read this
There both types of numbers but a whole number is a number with no exponents or decimals, but decimals are like a broken un half whole number
