The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
A) Its a sentence fragment
Explanation:
Sentence fragments are groups of words that look like sentences, but really aren't. To be a sentence, groups of words need to have at least one independent clause. This however does not have a independent clause.
Well one way is foreshadowing, it gives you a hint to the future.
Answer:
are you asking what story ends with i was lucky to be alive?
Explanation:
Answer: Clauses can be divided into two kinds: dependent and independent. A dependent clause contains a subject and verb, but cannot stand on its own as a complete sentence; an independent clause includes a subject and a verb, and expresses a complete thought.
Explanation:
