Explanation:
by considering that ch4 is limiting, we get that answer using mole ratios.
Answer: elevation
, The boundaries of a watershed are determined by topography, which is the shape or the physical features of the land's surface. If the highest points of land surrounding a river were connected (like “connect-the-dots”), this line would form the watershed boundary.
Answer:
Dependent on the element that reacted with carbon
Explanation:
Nuclear fusion is the combination of small atomic nuclei into larger ones usually accompanied with the release of a large amount of energy.
From the problem stated, carbon fuses with another atom. The combined atom would have more nuclear particles in terms of protons and neutrons than the combining atoms. This will eventually make it weigh more than carbon and the atom it combines with. The resulting weight will depend on the combining atoms eventually.
A bond is non polar if it is between same atoms and polar if it is between different atoms.
Same atoms are like two dogs of same strength pulling a bone towards towards each other. But when it’s different atoms it’s like a big dog and small dog then the bone is more towards bigger dog. So it’s the same way in bonds.
Bonds are made up of electrons, when the more stronger pulling atom is present than other the electrons are more towards it and as a result we have polar bond. There is development of a kind of a negative pole and a positive pole.
The stronger atom has electrons towards itself so it has a little more negative charge while the other atom has positive charge. This makes bond polar.
So just look for bond between two different atoms, it would be polar.
Look at the pic below to see the answer.
Marked with green is bond between same atoms... one carbon and another carbon so it is not polar and test marked with blue are polar.
Well the answer should have been 10 but since the bonds at 3 and 8 are two of same type we count only one of them.
The answer is 8... well the answer should be 10 otherwise... discuss it with ur teacher
The constant use of water flow throwout nature and the way that we use it now isint good and most likly we will be out of water by the year 2055