Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

6

There are situations for which it is either impossible to compute a mean or the mean does not provide a central, representative

value.
a. True
b. False

1 answer:

Alika [10]3 years ago

6 0

True. I hope that this helps

You might be interested in

Worker A is more effective than Worker B. Both workers become less effective as their workloads increase. Both workers are paid

sineoko [7]

Answer: False

Explanation:

Question mentions that even though Worker A and Worker B are both paid the same salary and become less effective as their workload increase, Worker A is still more effective than Worker B.

The optimal allocation therefore would be one where Worker A get more of the 200 units of production than Worker B because they would be able to produce more as they are more effective.

8 0

3 years ago

The theory that higher-income taxpayers should be taxed less because their savings and investments stimulate the economy is know

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

The correct answer is: supply side economics.

Explanation:

Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory which advocates lowering of taxes and decrease in regulation to boost economic growth. It is directly in contrast to demand-side economics.

This theory focuses on reducing taxes, decreasing regulations on producers and declining borrowing rates.

This theory states that economic growth can be stimulated by boosting investments through tax reduction.

6 0

3 years ago

Lamont Communications has amortized a patent on a straight-line basis since it was acquired in 2010 at a cost of $50 million. Du

Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

C) Patent amortization expense of $5 million.

Explanation:

Patent acquisition date is 2010

Cost of acquisition = $50 million

Initial Useful life = 20 years

Annual amortization = $50,000,000/20

= $2,500,000

Between 2010 and start of 2013 is 3 years

Carrying value at the start of 2013

= 50,000,000 - 3(2,500,000)

= $42,500,000

If patent would be received over a total period of 8 years rather than the 20-year legal life being used to amortize the cost,

Patent amortization expense in 2013 = $42,500,000/8

= $5,312,500

This can be estimated as $5 million.

The right option is C) Patent amortization expense of $5 million.

6 0

4 years ago

Analyzing and Reporting Financial Statement Effects of Transactions M.E. Carter launched Carter Company, a professional services

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

$18,000

Explanation:

To find the Sales Revenue we simply add the $12,000 cash received immediately, and the $30,000 received as partial payment, totalling $42,000.

Then, we simply complete the proposed income statement:

Income Statement for the Month Ended in March 31

Sales Revenue $42,000

Rent Expense $9,600

Wage Expense $14,400

Net Income $18,000

Net Income is equal to Revenue - expenses.

7 0

3 years ago

Talamoto Co. manufactures a single product that goes through two processes — mixing and cooking. The following data pertains to

Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

A. 100,000 equivalent units

Explanation:

Calculation for what the Total equivalent units for Material P under the weighted-average method are calculated to

First step is to calculate the Unit transferred out

Unit transferred out = 28,000+72,000-16,000

Unit transferred out =84,000

Now let calculate the Total equivalent units for Material P

Total Equivalent unit of material P = 84,000+16,000

Total Equivalent unit of material P = 100,000

Therefore the Total equivalent units for Material P under the weighted-average method are calculated to 100,000 equivalent units

7 0

3 years ago