Answer:
The Conditoned Stimulus is the smell and the taste of the coffee; and the Condtioned Stimulus Responses alertness
Explanation:
CONDITONED STIMULUS are stimulus which are neutral that often cause some response when they are associated with a natural stimulus in which response that is been triggers is referred to as conditioned response while CONDITIONED RESPONSE are response which are in form of a behaviour in which they don't come naturally but a person or an individual may learned it by pairing a neutral stimulus with a potent stimulus.
Therefore based on the information given about Tyrone the Conditoned Stimulus is the SMELL and the TASTE of the coffee while the Condtioned Stimulus Responses ALARTNESS which was why Tyrone was surprised to learn that the coffee was decaffeinated because he had actually felt more alert after drinking it.
Answer:
It would be more expensive It requires more money
Explanation:
Aspects of a study conducted of cars in a certain country will be to determine the general traits of consumer buying and motorists. This could include: whether a car runs on diesel or electricity to gain information for a survey on pollution of motor vehicles; also, size of a car, the frequency of use, the purpose of use, how old a car is and how many passengers are generally seated in the car. All of these factors can be used to glean invaluable information for the automotive industry, as well as for scientific studies and governments.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
