<span>Tim’s desire to demonstrate remorse for his sanctions as well as demonstrate his understanding of the consequences of his poor behavior. This promise is an example of Tim attempting to secure future employees within with his current organization. Tim is ultimately owning my up to a mistake like a true man.</span>
Answer:
a. Failure to pay penalty = 400
b. Failure to file penalty = $4,000
Explanation:
The monthly rate for failure to pay penalty is 0.5% while the failure to file penalty.
Since it is assumed that there are 30 days in a month, the 35 days after the due date of the return without obtaining an extension from the IRS is will be counted as 2 months regardless of the fact that the second month is just 5 files when she filed.
Therefore, we have:
a. Failure to pay penalty = $40,000 * 0.5% * 2 = 400
b. Failure to file penalty = ($40,000 * 5% * 2) = $4,000
c. Total penalties = (Failure to file penalty - failure to pay penalty for the same period) + Failure to pay penalty = ($4,000 - $400) + $400 = $4,000.
Therefore, the total penalty Isabella will pay is $4,000.
<span>
$300,000 / 30% = 1,000,000 - 300,000 = $700,000 </span>
Answer:
Yes, the FTC would ignore the merger and allow it to go through.
Explanation:
here are the options to the question ;
O No, the FTC would probably challenge the merger
O Maybe. The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decislon.
Yes, the FTC would ignore the merger and allow it to go through.
HHI is used to calculate market power.
if the HHI index is less than 1000 post merger, the merger would be allowed to go through.
If the HHI index is between 1000 - 1800 post merger and the change in HHI is more than 100 after the merger, The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decislon.
If the HHI index is more than 1800 post merger and the change in HHI is more than or equal to 50, he FTC would probably challenge the merger
Answer:
d. hostile takeover; tender offer
Explanation:
The hostile takeover is the transaction of the merger in which the management of the firm i.e. targeted would not support and acquirer could attempt to gain the control for purchasing the enough shares. And this could be achieved via a tender offer
Therefore as per the given situation, the option d is correct
hence, the same is to be considered
