We' supposed to indicate which statement is true/false.
Note that, if a sample size is 40 or over, we can use the t distribution even with skewed data. So it's not highly sensitive to non-normality of the population from which samples are taken. So statement A is false.
It's true that the t-distribution assumes that the population from which samples are drawn is normally distributed. So B is true.
For skewed data or with extreme outliers, we can't use the t distribution. We only use t distribution as long as we believe that the population from which samples are drawn is closed to a bell-shape. So C is true.
Lastly, statement D is against statement C. So D is false.
Answer:
17
Step-by-step explanation:
Use ratio method
98:2
850:x
so, x = (850 x 2) divided by 98 = 17.3469388
Round it to nearest whole number = 17
(6x+4) hope this helped
please leave a thank you
Answer:
2.5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
The relation between time, speed, and distance is ...
distance = speed × time
We can define t to be Stanley's swimming time. Then t+0.5 was his running time, and 2(t+0.5) was his biking time. His total distance covered is ...
64 = 9(t +0.5) +16(2(t +0.5)) +2.5(t)
64 = 43.5t +20.5 . . . . . . . simplify
43.5 = 43.5t . . . . . . . . . subtract 20.5
t = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by the coefficient of t
Stanley swam for 1 hour, so the distance he covered while swimming was ...
(2.5 mi/h)(1 h) = 2.5 mi
Stanley covered 2.5 miles while swimming.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Stanley ran for 1.5 hours, covering 9×1.5 = 13.5 miles. He biked for 3 hours, covering 16×3 = 48 miles. His total distance was 2.5 +13.5 +48 = 64 miles, as given.
Answer:
if im not mistaken its 143
