Answer:
No, because AB is 2/5 the length MN but CD is 1/3 the length QP.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparing the corresponding sides, the length of AB is 4. The length of MN is 10. This makes their ratio 4/10 = 2/5.
The length of CD is 2. The length of QP is 6. this makes their ratio 2/6 = 1/3.
The ratios of the sides are not the same, so the figure is not proportional and is therefore not a dilation.
Answer:
The correct option based on the below computation of Sharpe ratio for all funds is option C,Fund C.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sharpe ratio=(Average return of the fund-risk free rate of return)/standard deviation of the fund
Risk free rate of return is 6%
Fund A:
Sharpe ratio=(24%-6%)/30%=0.6
Fund B:
Sharpe ratio=(12%-6%)/10%=0.6
Fund C:
Sharpe ratio=(22%-6%)/20%=0.8
Fund has a sharpe ratio of 0.8 ,unlike funds A& B that have a ratio of 0.6 each
In other words option C is correct
If lines are paralel, then they have the same slope
if the lines are pependicuilar, the slopes mutiply to -1
so
y=mx+b
m=slope
and
ax+by=c
-a/b is the slope
given
y=2/3x-2
slope is 2/3
x+y=4
slope is -1/1 or -1
2/3≠-1 and -1 times 2/3≠-1 so they are neither perpendicular or paralell
since they aren't paralell, we know they intersect somewhere
<em>AC bisects ∠BAD, => ∠BAC=∠CAD ..... (1)</em>
<em>thus in ΔABC and ΔADC, ∠ABC=∠ADC (given), </em>
<em> ∠BAC=∠CAD [from (1)],</em>
<em>AC (opposite side side of ∠ABC) = AC (opposite side side of ∠ADC), the common side between ΔABC and ΔADC</em>
<em>Hence, by AAS axiom, ΔABC ≅ ΔADC,</em>
<em>Therefore, BC (opposite side side of ∠BAC) = DC (opposite side side of ∠CAD), since (1)</em>
<em />
Hence, BC=DC proved.
Option C
Corresponding angles along parrellel lines are conguerent
Answered by Gauthmath pls mark brainliest and comment thanks and click thanks
