Answer:
Investing is riskier, but has the potential for a higher rate of return.
Explanation:
Savings is the action of putting money aside for future use. An individual saves when they have money that they do not have an immediate use for, or to accumulate funds for a set objective. Saving is risk-free as the money is simply kept aside in a secure place, preferably a bank account.
Investing is engaging in commercial activities to generate wealth. It involves making decisions on activities that result in profits. However, there are chances that the selected activities might result in losses rather than profits as intended. Activities that present higher chances of profits bear higher chances of big losses.
Saving is risk-free as the probability of losing money is minimal compared to investing, which offers chances of profits, but losses are possible.
Answer: "market segmentation" .
_______________________________________________
Answer:
The answer is: B) No, since the marginal cost of drug control exceeds the marginal benefit, the government should not spend $4,170 to deter one person from using drugs.
Explanation:
There are two ways in analyzing this situation, economically the government shouldn't spend that much money to prevent someone from using drugs, the marginal costs are much larger than the marginal benefits ($4,170 ˃ $897).
But if you only use this type of analysis for government spending, why should the firefighters try to stop a fire? Many times it is much more expensive and risky to do it.
Answer:
Legal Risk
Explanation:
Legal risk are damage, financial, reputational losses or any other form of loss received by a business due to negligence in compliance with the law related to the business. They are prospective fines or loses that a business or an organization receives for not complying with the business law and regulations.
In this case, the prospective loss could come by associating with Azpak limited which have inadequate protection of intellectual property rights.