Answer:
The range consistent with both sets would be $34.00 to $37.40. This includes the smallest value that is within both the P/E and EV/EBITDA ranges ($34) and the highest value within both ranges ($37.40)
Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
If true, the following will most seriously weakens the argument: There has been an increasing rate in store opening in the central shopping district (CSD) since Colson's have opened discount stores.
Since after Colson's opened, the locations which were vacant became stores in particular discount store which did not spar with Colson's. Now that we have a discount store & department store without discount. Therefore when these stores close while competing with SpendLess, they wont be replaced with regular non-discount stores .
Current ratio is a comparison of current assets to current liabilities, calculated by dividing your current assets by your current liabilities.
The quick ratio compares the total amount of cash + marketable securities + accounts receivable to the amount of current liabilities.
A. Inventory would be a factor in both of these ration (assets). In both of these industries, inventory would be low. You cannot readily stockpile energy and burgers are perishable items.
B. It is true that both of these industries would have low outstanding accounts receivable because people will need their power to survive and fast food places don't offer credit.
C. These two industries deal with cash mainly. Cash doesn't have to be physical currency, but accounts that can easily be paid.
D. Low current and quick ratios are actually signs of good management not poor management.
All of the above are correct EXCEPT answer D.
Answer:
Proposal A: $185,714.29
Proposal B: $160,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
$10,000 for installations to be completed.
The revenue generated by each unit is $ 20.00
Proposal A:
Fixed costs= 55,000
The variable cost is $13.00
Proposal B:
Fixed costs= 70,000
The variable cost is $10.00
Break-even point (dollars)= fixed costs/ contribution margin ratio
Proposal A: (55,000+10,000)/[(20-13)/20]= $185,714.29
Proposal B: (70,000 + 10,000)/[(20-10)/20]= $160,000
Answer: d. No, a contract has not been formed, since Harry has not signed a contract for the goods.
Explanation:
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) utilizes the Statute of Frauds which states that contracts for goods worth over $500 in value are to be signed for them to be valid.
The goods here are worth:
= 1,200 * 2
= $2,400
This contract is well worth over the $500 required for the contract to be signed which means that as Harry did not sign the contract, there is no contract.
