Answer:
Part a)

Part b)



Part c)



Explanation:
Part a)
As we know that charge density is the ratio of total charge and total volume
So here the volume of the charge ball is given as



now the charge density of the ball is given as

Part b)
Now the charge enclosed by the surface is given as

at radius of 5 cm


at radius of 10 cm


at radius of 20 cm

Part c)
As we know that electric field is given as

so we have electric field at r = 5 cm


electric field at r = 10 cm


electric field at r = 20 cm


In naming covalent compound (binary) based in IUPAC naming, we have 4 rules to be followed:
1. The first element of the formula will use the normal name of the given element. for example: CO2 ( Carbon Dioxide), Carbon is the element name of the first element of the formula.
2. The second element is named as if they are treated like an anion but put in mind that these are no ions in a covalent compound but we put -ide on the second element as if it is an anion.
3. Prefixes are used to indicate the number of atom of the elements in the compound. for example: mono- 1 atom, di- 2atoms, tri- 3 atoms and etc
4. Prefix "mono"is never used in naming the first element. For example: Carbon dioxide, there should be no monocarbon dioxide.
Answer:
the angle of incidence θ is 45.56 º
Explanation:
Given data
strikes the mirror before wall x = 30.7 cm
reflected ray strikes the wall y = 30.1 cm
to find out
the angle of incidence θ
solution
let us consider ray is strike at angle θ so after strike on surface ray strike to wall at angle 90 - θ
we will apply here right angle triangle rule that is
tan( 90 - θ) = y /x
tan( 90 - θ) = 30.1 / 30.7
90 - θ = tan^-1 (30.1/30.7)
90 - θ = 44.4345
θ = 45.56 º
the angle of incidence θ is 45.56 º
Answer:
Stupid
Explanation:
Because there is never a answer when we are trying to find one
Answer:
proportional to the current in the wire and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.
Explanation:
The magnetic field produced by a long, straight current-carrying wire is given by:

where
is the vacuum permeability
I is the current intensity in the wire
r is the distance from the wire
From the formula, we notice that:
- The magnitude of the magnetic field is directly proportional to I, the current
- The magnitude of the magnetic field is inversely proportional to the distance from the wire, r
Therefore, correct option is
proportional to the current in the wire and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.