Answer:
well 1. Who decided it was illegal to remove the Cherokee from their land, and this is why.
From that point forward, Georgia politicians, including George Troup, George R. Gilmer, and Wilson Lumpkin, increasingly raised the pressure on the federal government to fulfill the Compact of 1802, in which the federal government had agreed to extinguish the Indian land title and remove the Cherokees from the state
2. Now you need to understand why were natives forced from their land, and this is why.
Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians' land, the federal government forced them to leave their homelands and walk hundreds of miles to a specially designated “Indian territory” across the Mississippi River.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
It will determine the future security of the nation
Answer:
(A) Rational decision making, bounded rationality, and intuition
Explanation:
Rational decision making is a multi-step process for making choices between alternatives. The process ofrational decision making favors logic, objectivity, and analysis over subjectivity and insight.
Bounded rationality is the idea that in decision-making,rationality of individuals is limited by the information they have, the cognitive limitations of their minds, and the finite amount of time they have to make a decision.
Intuition is the ability to have a grasp on a situation or information without the need for reasoning. The opposite ofintuitive decision making is rational decision making, which is when individuals use analytics, facts and a step-by-step process to come to a decision.
Rational decision making, bounded rationality, and intuition plays an important role in making decisions.
Answer:
Explanation: I think to build a positive relationship with citizens you would have to listen to the people, not be rude about stuff, give the people what they ask for (depends tho) and always be kind and caring show that you care for your people.
hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
Many people are very scared that a stronger governent would mean less rights for individuals. States might prefer to decide things like voting laws, drinking/driving ages, or recycling laws by themselves.
