Answer:
she was wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
x-4-11 = 0 (4+-1=4-1)
x=15
hence she was wrong
Emily = x
Samantha = x + 2
Lauren = x + 4
x + (x + 2) + (x + 4) = 42
x = 12
Thus:
Emily = 12
Samantha = 14
Lauren = 16
Triangle 1 has vertices at (A, B), (C, D), and (E, F). Triangle 2 has vertices at (A,-B), (C,-D), and (E,-F). What can you concl
almond37 [142]
Answer:
Triangle 2 is a transformation from Triangle 1, and has been reflected across the x-axis.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conclude that Triangle 2 is a reflection across the x-axis because the x values stayed the same but the y values are negative.
In a reflection across the x-axis, the x values will stay the same. But, since it is flipped across the x-axis, the y values will become negative.
So, Triangle 2 is a reflection across the x-axis.
Very technically, yes. But . . .
-- Its angles would be 0°, 0°, and 180° .
-- Its height and area would both be zero.
-- It would look like a line segment, because the two ' 6 ' legs
would have to be wide open in a straight line, and they would
lie right on top of the ' 12 ' leg ... that's the only way they could
reach between the ends of it.
