All categories

3 years ago

Which is bigger 800 cm or 8 mm

Mathematics

2 answers:

Paha777 [63]3 years ago

8 0

Hello :)

800 cm is your answer

Hope this helps

Llana [10]3 years ago

6 0

800 cm is bigger than 8 mm because cm is larger than mm.

You might be interested in

Write the equation of a line that goes through the points (-2, -5) and (3, -10)

AlekseyPX

The equation for slope between two points is (y1-y2)/x1-x2
Plug the points into the equation

-5-(-10)/-2-3
5/5
m=1
To find the equation, use y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-(-5)=1(x-(-2))
y+5=x+2
y=x+2-5
y=x-3

7 0

3 years ago

Plz help me ...<br> please

r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

x = -1, and y = -2, giving you the answer (-1, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

In the second equation, we're told that y is equal to 2x. With that, we can replace "y" in the first one with "2x", giving us:

-4x - 2x = 6

-6x = 6

x = -1

Now that we know the value of x, we can simply plug it into the first equation to find y:

-4x - y = 6

-4(-1) - y = 6

4 - y = 6

-4 + y = -6

y = -6 + 4

y = -2

So x = -1, and y = -2

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Four time a number r plus half a number s equals 12. Twice the number r plus one fourth of the numbers s equals 8. What are the

Snezhnost [94]

The system of equations have no solution.

Explanation:

The equations are $4r+\frac{1}{2}s=12$ and $2r+\frac{1}{4} s=8$

To find the two numbers, let us solve the equations using substitution method.

From the equation $2r+\frac{1}{4} s=8$ , let us determine the value of r,

$\begin{aligned} 2 r+\frac{1}{4} s &=8 \\ 2 r &=8-\frac{1}{4} s \\ r &=\frac{1}{2}\left(8-\frac{1}{4} s\right) \\ r &=4-\frac{1}{8} s \end{aligned}$

Let us substitute the value of r in $4r+\frac{1}{2}s=12$ , we get,

$\begin{aligned} 4\left(4-\frac{1}{8} s\right)+\frac{1}{2} s &=12 \\ 16-\frac{1}{2} s+\frac{1}{2} s &=12 \\ 16 &=12 \end{aligned}$

which is not possible.

This means that the system has no solution.

6 0

4 years ago

Please help me. any help will be great:)

Cloud [144]

It is 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555

6 0

3 years ago

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

3 years ago