Answer:
The perceived economic impact of CO2 generated per year by lighting sstem is $8164.67.
Explanation:
The CO2 requirement for the plant is:
Amount of CO2 per year = (2.4 lb / KWh)(300,000 KWh)
Amount of CO2 per year = (720000 lb)(1 ton/ 2204.62 lb)
Amount of CO2 per year = 326.59 ton
The perceived economic impact of CO2 generated per year will then be:
Economic Impact = ($25 / ton)(326.59 ton)
<u>Economic Impact = $8164.67</u>
To put out a class D metal fire, you must smother the fire and eliminate the oxygen element in the fire.
<h3>What is a Class D fire?</h3>
A class D fire is a type of fire that cannot be extinguished by water. This is because adding water to it reacts with other elements in the fire intensifying the fire even more.
Smothering in this context involves adding a solution like carbon dioxide (CO2) into the fire, this results in a reduction of oxygen in the atmosphere surrounding the class D fire.
By so doing, smothering the fire eliminates the oxygen element in the fire, thereby extinguishing the fire.
You can learn more about extinguishing fires here https://brainly.in/question/760550
#SPJ1
Answer:
The elevation at the high point of the road is 12186.5 in ft.
Explanation:
The automobile weight is 2500 lbf.
The automobile increases its gravitational potential energy in
. It means the mobile has increased its elevation.
The initial elevation is of 5183 ft.
The first step is to convert Btu of potential energy to adequate units to work with data previously presented.
British Thermal Unit -
Now we have the gravitational potential energy in lbf*ft. Weight of the mobile is in lbf and the elevation is in ft. We can evaluate the expression for gravitational potential energy as follows:
Where m is the mass of the automobile, g is the gravity, W is the weight of the automobile showed in the problem.
is the final elevation and
is the initial elevation.
Replacing W in the Ep equation
Finally, the next step is to replace the variables of the problem.
The elevation at the high point of the road is 12186.5 in ft.
Answer:
B) the liquid accelerated to high velocities.
<em>I</em><em> </em><em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this helps</em><em> </em>
complete question
A certain amplifier has an open-circuit voltage gain of unity, an input resistance of 1 \mathrm{M} \Omega1MΩ and an output resistance of 100 \Omega100Ω The signal source has an internal voltage of 5 V rms and an internal resistance of 100 \mathrm{k} \Omega.100kΩ. The load resistance is 50 \Omega.50Ω. If the signal source is connected to the amplifier input terminals and the load is connected to the output terminals, find the voltage across the load and the power delivered to the load. Next, consider connecting the load directly across the signal source without the amplifier, and again find the load voltage and power. Compare the results. What do you conclude about the usefulness of a unity-gain amplifier in delivering signal power to a load?
Answer:
3.03 V 0.184 W
2.499 mV 125*10^-9 W
Explanation:
First, apply voltage-divider principle to the input circuit: 1
*5
= 4.545 V
The voltage produced by the voltage-controlled source is:
A_voc*V_i = 4.545 V
We can find voltage across the load, again by using voltage-divider principle:
V_o = A_voc*V_i*(R_o/R_l+R_o)
= 4.545*(100/100+50)
= 3.03 V
Now we can determine delivered power:
P_L = V_o^2/R_L
= 0.184 W
Apply voltage-divider principle to the circuit:
V_o = (R_o/R_o+R_s)*V_s
= 50/50+100*10^3*5
= 2.499 mV
Now we can determine delivered power:
P_l = V_o^2/R_l
= 125*10^-9 W
Delivered power to the load is significantly higher in case when we used amplifier, so a unity gain amplifier can be useful in situation when we want to deliver more power to the load. It is the same case with the voltage, no matter that we used amplifier with voltage open-circuit gain of unity.