Answer:
he is 100% confident in his reasoning
Explanation:
According to my research on the literary arts, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Paine most likely uses this language to convince his audience that he is 100% confident in his reasoning. This can be inferred because he compares his reasoning to something that is completely there and cannot be refuted (ray of light).
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
Everyone has a right to be fed and have a good education, and have a roof over their head.
Answer:
um there's no picture so i don't know
