1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cluponka [151]
3 years ago
14

Man is rational, social, and spiritual being composed of body and soul, endowed with intellect, thus capable of seeking, attaini

ng and enjoying truth.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the rational bases and natural rules of morality ... man's perfect good which is happiness, consists in riches, and others in pleasures ... intellect assents to something, not through being sufficiently moved to this assent by its ... truth, the spirituality and the immortality of the soul, the existence and Every man must have a philosophy, even if it is never made explicit. ... There is going to be social and political and economic evolution, which will explode ... right, reason cannot function because the fruits of rationality cannot be enjoyed. ... The soul, which is regarded as a distinct entity from the body and the spiritual

You might be interested in
We say we have learned something when a subject certain events, behaviors or stimuli together. We call this process
Nookie1986 [14]

Explanation:

I think the answer is option 3

4 0
3 years ago
The term whip in discussions of congress refers to
pashok25 [27]

The term whip in discussion of congress is being defined as the party’s enforcers by which they are likely to have fellow legislators to be invited by means of having them to attend the voting sessions and as well as to vote accordingly in regards to official party policy.

8 0
3 years ago
In a (            ),leaders are elected by the (           ) and must answer them. all democracies have free,fair,and competitiv
skelet666 [1.2K]
5 Vice President lives
6 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
The formation of associations between two stimuli, which occur sequentially in time, is referred to as ____.
enyata [817]
Hello There!

<span>The formation of associations between two stimuli, which occur sequentially in time, is referred to as classical conditioning. 
</span>
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :) 

- Hannah ❤
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which climate zone would be most likely to be considered equatorial in Australia? A. Arid, B. Semiarid, C. Marine west coast, D.
    8·1 answer
  • Mosses are examples of which type of plant?​
    15·2 answers
  • Why was the Cuban missile crisis a dangerous threat to the world?
    8·1 answer
  • Jennifer and Selena are employed by their firms to sell its products. Jennifer is required to go to the customer's residence and
    11·1 answer
  • The three items listed above are called the Reconstruction Amendments. What was the main purpose of these three amendments?
    15·1 answer
  • How many cultures are there in the world?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do most people in the United States today consider themselves to be a part of the middle class​
    6·1 answer
  • What was it called when states were allowed to choose if they want it to be a slave state or a free state
    6·1 answer
  • “In 100 words or less, tell me what happens of note on January 6th and January 20th that has to do with the electoral college?”
    15·1 answer
  • What is a general eqation for photosythisis
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!